By: Thomas Wigand

Deductive Reasoning: Reaching an answer or a decision by thinking carefully about the known facts. - Cambridge Dictionary

KNOWN FACT: SARS-CoV-2 (a/k/a Covid-19) originated in a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) bioweapons lab - the Wuhan Institute of Virology (whether it was released intentionally or by accident to-be-determined).  It did not "jump species" at the "Wuhan wet market."

KNOWN FACT: It is the result of "gain of function" research that aims at increasing transmissibility between humans. (Research also exploring increasing lethality?)

KNOWN FACT: In the years immediately preceding the global pandemic - to bypass "gain of function" research restrictions in the United States - Anthony Fauci and his NIAID funded Wuhan's gain-of-function researchh.  It did so by funding grants through the Britain-based EcoHealth Alliance, run by a man named Peter Daszak - which in turn funded Wuhan (essentially, research-grant money laundering).

KNOWN FACT: In December, 2017, the outgoing Obama administration - presumably after input and involvement by Anthony Fauci - lifted the ban on direct U.S. funding for gain-of-function research.

KNOWN FACT: Governments across the globe, on an obviously coordinated basis - along with a compliant media (also on an obviously coordinated basis) - presented the danger of SARS-CoV-2 as something equivalent to (if not worse than) the 1918 Spanish Flu.  Citizens across the globe were led to believe that tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions would die - and were thereby rendered receptive to: first, "weeks to flatten the curve" to then, "lockdowns" to then, "vaccine passports" (and increasingly, mandatory "vaccination").

KNOWN FACT: Yet, SARS-CoV-2 has in excess of a 99% recovery rate, and is readily treatable with therapeutics such as HCQ and Ivermectin.

KNOWN FACT: Low Vitamin D levels have been shown to be a primary risk factor for serious complications with SARS-CoV-2.

KNOWN FACT: Government authorities and media worldwide, on a coordinated basis, have actively - indeed vehemently - suppressed public information regarding the therapeutics and Vitamin D. (Would you not expect that public health authorities, at a minimum, would have produced public service announcements encouraging the public to get their Vitamin D levels tested, and to take supplements as appropriate?)

KNOWN FACT:  In the U.S. (and elsewhere) government authorities - in some cases with the cooperation of corporate pharmaceutical chains - have worked to cut-off access to those effective therapeutics, including by refusing to fill prescriptions, and threatening prescribing physicians with loss of jobs and licensure.  This inevitably resulted in, and continues to result in deaths that were preventable.

KNOWN FACT: Experimental gene therapies (mRNA) that did not fit the long-established definition of vaccines (i.e., imparting immunity) were fast-tracked into "Emergency Use Authorization" (EUA) approval.  EUA status provides complete immunity from liability for the manufacturers.  Under law, EUA products cannot be approved for use if effective alternative therapeutics are available (which likely explains the suppression of information regarding HCQ and Ivermectin).

KNOWN FACT: Pfizer strong-armed countries into signing deals for the "vaccines" that can only be described as unconscionable - including countries assuming all liability for death and injury from the "vaccines" - and putting up national assets as collateral to pay claims.  (Terms so unconscionable that they "shock the conscience," and prompt one to wonder if some government officials weren't bribed and/or blackmailed in order to obtain "agreement" to the terms.  This video report from Indian media provides compelling context.)

It appears that full-text (unredacted) versions of Pfizer's agreement(s) with the United States still have not been made public.

KNOWN FACT: Pfizer and Moderna gamed even the insufficient "fast track" studies for safety and efficacy by eliminating the control groups from the studies - in midstream!  Despite this, FDA EUA approval was issued. [Keep in mind that "vaccination" of a majority of the population - including children who are inherently not at risk - would accomplish elimination of the "control group" of vax-free in the general population.  This would make it near-impossible to identify correlation between the "vaccines" and later morbidity and infertility - thus providing "plausible deniability" for the culpable.]

KNOWN FACT:  Also, in August, 2021, the FDA (with great fanfare in the compliant media) told the public that the Pfizer Covid-19 "vaccine" under the brand-name Comirnaty was "approved."  This led to a cascade of employers mandating employees to subject themselves to "the jab" as a condition of continued employment. 

The FDA announcement, and media portrayals of it, were so misleading as to constitute deliberate fraud.  Buried in the FDA announcement were uncomfortable admissions: Comirnaty itself is still experimental, in that required studies are still ongoing (including the effect on pregnant women).  In any case, Comirnaty is still not available in the U.S. - people are still being injected with the experimental "Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine" (as the FDA calls it), even as the FDA announcement declared it to be "legally distinct" from Comirnaty. 

What does that mean?  People who are jabbed with the EUA product cannot sue the manufacturers for injury or death resulting, while the federal program (i.e., taxpayers instead of manufacturers paying) for compensation victims of EUA vaccines is notoriously shall we say “stingy.”

So, a life-threatening "bait and switch" occurred: people were led to believe that they were receiving a fully approved, "safe and effective" vaccine - when in reality they've part unwitting participants in an ongoing medical experiment, for a gene therapy that now only technically be referred to as a "vaccine" due to a self-serving change in definition - as we'll see.

KNOWN FACT:  In September, 2021, as it became increasingly undeniable that the so-called vaccines were not imparting meaningful or lasting immunity, the FDA quietly watered-down its definition of "vaccine" to something merely generating an "immune response."  This enabled it to continue to refer to the experimental gene therapy products as "vaccines."

KNOWN FACT: The publicly released ingredient list for the Pfizer vaccines is in question.  The actual ingredients, and proportions of those ingredients, remain hidden from independent researchers, and the people (and now their children) who are being compelled to inject it into their bodies.  There are also questions re: uniformity; there is evidence that different lots or batches may have different "recipes."  If so, the question becomes: are these variations within accepted norms, due to sloppy manufacturing / quality control practices, or intentional as part of an experiment to see have the jabbed population reacts to different "recipes?"

KNOWN FACT: The FDA is attempting to glacially slow-walk release of information regarding how these "vaccines" were approved for an EUA - to beyond the remaining lifetimes of those involved. 

KNOWN FACT:  Since the early 1970s and the "Club of Rome" and publication of its "The Limits to Growth" - which predicted environmental collapse in the mid-21st century - influential people have been advocating for massive reductions in human global population, to "save the planet."

Query if that predicted environmental collapse date might be the genesis for the 2030 deadline to "save the planet" shared by both the U.N.'s "Agenda 2030" and D.A.V.O.S.'s "Great Reset?"

In any case, that Club of Rome rubric has metastasized into "climate change" and "sustainability" and "Build Back Better" under the World Economic Forum and its D.A.V.O.S.  minions. Advocates estimate that the optimal world population should be several billion below its current (approximately) 7.5 billion; as far down at 500 million (per the creepy "Georgia Guidestones").

KNOWN FACT: Bill Gates and the "Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation" are the present-day embodiment of such advocacy.  That Foundation, through grants, wields extraordinary influence in governmental and NGO "public health organizations."

KNOWN FACT: Since the beginning of this pandemic (of the 99% recovery rate), Bill Gates (along with Anthony Fauci) have been media go-to spokespersons advocating the "vaccines."

KNOWN FACT: Bill Gates has long been a proponent of reducing the global population, and has cited vaccines as having a role to play in that.

KNOWN FACT:  Elements of the CCP military, since at least the early 2000's, have advocated for the elimination of hundreds of millions of Americans - including through the use of bioweapons such as gain-of-function’d virus - so as to gain our farmland to feed the Chinese people.  Yes, you read that right. Take the time to read the entirety of the link in this paragraph - it’s absolutely horrifying.

KNOWN FACT:  Bill Gates has been buying up farmland here, and is at present the single largest holder of U.S. farmland.

KNOWN FACT:  Bill Gates has been buying up farmland here, and is at present the single largest holder of U.S. farmland.

KNOWN FACT: The CCP military's "unrestricted warfare" doctrine places great emphasis of biowarfare - possibly including research into gene-based biowarfare that could target certain ethnic groups for elimination, while sparing allied ones. In fact, the CCP may be calculating that America has already lost; that now it’s just a matter of time until we officially succumb. (See also here and here).

KNOWN FACT: The CCP has not been injecting its population with the mRNA "vaccines" from Pfizer, Moderna. 

KNOWN FACT: Before SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) was on the radar - or, at least, before it was on our radar - Pfizer has been, shall we say, "buddy, buddy" with the CCP and its development of "social credit scoring" "vaccine passports.”

KNOWN FACT: They're coming for the children; it is possible (that among other things) their fertility will be negatively impacted, if not eliminated.

KNOWN FACT: At least one scientific luminary, ex-Pfizer executive Dr. Michael Yeadon, is openly positing that the "vaccines" are actually depopulation mechanisms (genocide, or perhaps more accurately, democide. (A MUST WATCH!)

Based upon these known facts, we can conclude:

The global response to "COVID-19" was never about public health - otherwise the response would have been to promote preventatives (Vitamin D), therapeutics (HCQ / Ivermectin) and hospital protocols NOT resembling - nor following in lock-step - those pushed by the CDC.

Neither can it be explained as a simple money-grab by "Big Pharma."  That is not to say that money-gab has not been a major element.

If nothing else, likely numerous unwitting public officials have been bought-off by Big Pharma money (e.g., lobbyists' money) without necessarily knowing the ultimate ends of that they have helped enable.  That said, presumably many are knowingly complicit. 

Nevertheless, the global scope and scale of the response was coordinated and uniform - including the shut-downs of entire economies, the totalitarian duplicitous / then coercive / then forcible "vaccination" of populations - almost certainly evidences some plan (plot) which cannot be explained by money and greed alone.

On the other hand, the emerging global imposition of "vaccine passports" would appear to be a major element of the overall scheme.  It cannot be coincidental that Pfizer has teamed with the CCP for just such things, and that once in place, "vaccine passports" are but a few keystrokes away from then being able to install a CCP "social credit score" control mechanism across the globe.  At the same time, the fact that embedded chips are now being promoted gets us uncomfortably close to "Mark of the Beast" territory. 

A global "social credit score" system operated on behalf of who?  Prime suspects would have to include (and perhaps be confined to) D.A.V.O.S. and the CCP.

"Vaccine passports" are not incompatible with an agenda to massively depopulate the globe; nor is a depopulation agenda incompatible with a plot to "debt trap" "foreclosures" on nation-states and their citizens.  A post-genocide population - a decimated, bereft group of survivors that truly does "own nothing" and is dependent upon a "universal basic income" reduced to eating bugs instead of meat as preferable to starving - is not likely to quibble over having to some "passport" (embedded or otherwise) in order to eat and otherwise survive.

In such a post-apocalyptic situation - likely made to appear not man-made - they're also less likely to meaningfully question why their savings, assets, and promised retirement benefits went poof in the collapse of the global fiat-currency system.  And even if they do, at that point they won't be in a position to do anything about it.

Speaking of depopulation by genocide (or democide, if you prefer) - what if one intended to wipe out hundreds of millions, maybe billions.  How would one plan it?

Logistically, would be impossible to execute genocide on that scale "the old-fashioned way" - the Nazi (National Socialist) regime and its assembly-line genocide machine ran out of time, racking up "only" single-digit millions.

Stalin and Mao achieved greater numbers, into tens of millions, with deliberate famines inflicted upon targeted populations (had "climate change" been in the vernacular back then, one supposes that they would have blamed the famines on that).  But famines take time; back then they had the advantage of regimes largely closed off from the world and its attention.  With today's Internet, being able to keep a famine secret long enough to achieve the desired results is well-nigh impossible.

No, to be successful at this ambitious scale, one would have to complete it before the potential victims caught on and mounted a resistance; and ideally, structured so that they would never catch-on, at least until well after they were in any position to do anything about it.  Otherwise, there's the risk that survivors - now grieving departed loved ones, or just moral people who remain - would seek justice against the perpetrators.  That could lead to a Nuremberg II and ropes around necks.

Yet absent nuclear war - which imperils all - the sudden demise of millions-to-billions can't help but draw unwanted attention.

So, a bioweapon that acted as a time-released death shot - one that killed people over time (but not too long … say on or before 2030?) - while also making it appear that the "cause of death" was a myriad range of "natural causes," would be perfect.

Especially if doses were jiggered in such a way that the reaction times were even more diffused: people who received one mix succumbing sooner than others who received a different mix, so that over a period of time people who died of strokes or myocarditis or cancer or auto-immune disease could be portrayed as random - not correlated to (or "correlatable" to) the "vaccines."

Infertility among children, appearing years (if not decades) after being subjected to the gene jabs, could then also be explained away - the passage of time providing cover, or at least "plausible deniability."

For this to work, near universal administration of the "vaccine" would be necessary for eliminating the control group of an unvaccinated group in the general population (as was already done in the pre-EUA studies for "safety and efficacy").  Otherwise, they could provide a comparison that could be used to show correlation between the death shots "vaccines" and the millions to billions of deceased.

So, is it possible that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was merely the Trojan Horse, and the "vaccines" the actual (genocidal) bioweapons?  We can't yet say for sure.  But in light of the known facts, neither can we dismiss the possibility.  As criminal investigators would say, there is "probable cause" to at least ask the question, and the suspects have both "motive" and "opportunity."

Yes, it seems hard to fathom.  Unbelievable even.  Could anyone - or any group - really be that evil?  Yes. 

Over the 20^th century, Collectivism (the Communist variety thereof) has been responsible for the mass murder of approximately 100 million people.  All in the name of secular utopias under slogans like building a "workers' paradise."

Marxist utopianism and "building back better" to a Malthusian-resembling "sustainability" are not, in the end, all that distinguishable.  While the current genocidal aspirations - if they exist - may be of more grandiose scale, they are not historical anomalies.

Given this, how can (and should) we proceed?  We'll discuss that in the final installment of this series.